ENERGY > FOOTPRINTS

Tiny Bubbles, Big Footprint

Is soda harmful to the planet?

Warning: Contents in can may be more dangerous than they appear. We know soft drinks are bad for us nutritionally. The statistics show links between soda and obesity and nutritional deficiency; it’s just not good for our bodies. Between the artificial sweeteners, colors, additives and virtually no nutritional value, it falls far short of being something people should incorporate into their daily diets. Those statistics are out there, but is soda bad for the planet’s health too?

Americans just love soda. Since the 1970s, daily soft drink consumption has tripled. Americans now drink over 13 billion gallons of carbonated drinks each year. According to the National Soft Drink Association (NSDA), it averages out to around two 12-oz soft drinks each day for every man, woman and child in the US. With numbers that high, soft drinks have got to be doing something serious to our waist – and waste lines.

Let’s start with some facts about soft drink containers. About 45 percent of Aluminum cans are recycled each year (down from 68 percent in 1992), 31 percent of PET plastic bottles, and 25 percent of glass bottles. And this is at the same time that consumption is increasing. To put it another way, 55 percent of soda cans are made from virgin aluminum, 69 percent from non-recycled (but recyclable) plastic, and 75 percent of bottles are made with new glass. We’ve got a lot of waste going on here, and not a lot of recovery. At the same time, these manufacturing processes are using immense amounts of energy and fresh water just to create the soda container.

And don’t forget the wrappers on the outside of bottles, the plastic 6-pack rings, the cardboard cases, the energy used to transport the products, etc. Then you’ve got your garbage from soda fountains (plastic straws, lids, unrecyclable cups). The list goes on.

Now, we’ll get to the good stuff, the reason we continue to drink soft drinks, the delicious, dangerous, and possibly addicting liquid inside. The first ingredient in soda is plain ‘ole water. In fact, it takes about 2.5 liters of water to make 1 liter of soda. In 2006 Coca-Cola alone used up 80 billion gallons of water for use in its manufacturing of soda (including the water used for the soda itself, the manufacturing process, and the growing of ingredients). I might be going out on a limb here, but I’m fairly sure developing nations would rather have that fresh water than the imported soft drinks.

And that’s not all. For each $500 spent on products related to soft drinks and ice manufacturing, 0.439 metric tons of CO2 equivalent are released into the air. Considering the US beverage manufacturing and bottling industry rakes in about $70 billion each year, and without doing any hard calculations, I think it’s safe to say the industry produces quite a bit of carbon emissions.

Interestingly, with the help of Carbon Trust, PepsiCo has created a carbon footprint labeling system for its Tropicana orange juice, and has plans to release the carbon footprint of Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, and Gatorade.

Soft drinks are a processed beverage, and anything that has undergone processing releases toxins, uses energy, and creates waste. If you must drink soda, choose the lesser evil – bottles that offer multiple servings can help minimally reduce some small amount of waste. And always recycle. Check http://www.nrc-recycle.org/ for more information about recycling.

COMMENT ON ARTICLE
by Sylvia W
Maybe I'm just lucky, because I've never enjoyed carbonated beverages, nor the hassle involved with returning cans and bottles - they can charge us so quickly, yet we are required to waste our time wrestling with recalcitrant machines to get our nickels back. The end result is that for convenience, health and economic reasons I just don't drink the stuff. I don't see that changing any time soon ;-)
by Robert M. Shelby
If we have 360 million men, women & children in the U.S., your figure suggests each one (including infants) averages over 36 gallons of carbonated fluid intake per year. Beverages are typically 8 0z. each, suggesting the average citizen consumes 576 such drinks per year or 48 drinks per month, about one-and-a-half drinks per day. Can this really pan out? I'm no advocate for "soft drinks" but I abjure soft statistics. I agree that carbonation is bad for health. It acidifies the blood. The "industry" wastes too much energy and material. We must remember, though, that it does not add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, because our air is its main source. Companies like AIRCO separate ordinary air into its component gases, storing and selling them in high-pressure, steel bottles of different sizes to various industries. That, too, takes a lot of energy.
by Andrew Boniface
You say "I might be going out on a limb here, but I’m fairly sure developing nations would rather have that fresh water than the imported soft drinks", but the one generalization that can be truthfully made about 'Developing Nations' is that they do not speak with a single voice. Whom is it you mean in these nations? Their Central Governments? Local activist groups? Carpetbagging activists from 'Developed Nations'? Individual consumers? I expect that each of these constituencies would have different answers to the Soda vs. fresh water question. And then there's variation between nations! Even if we sit in our Ivory Towers, and proclaim what 'Developing Nations' [ought to] want, we have to look at the opinions they already have and why. If by 'developing' you mean 'disadvantaged', the one thing fairly certain is that if anyone listens to the poorest of the poor, these people scarcely matter to the powers that be there.